Russia increased long-range raids and sent troops to attack Bakhmut, forcing the West to race to supply more powerful weapons to Ukraine.
Ukraine is facing a tense situation in the Donbass, where the Russian military is sending well-trained reserves into hot spots occupied by Wagner mercenaries in recent times. This additional force is more elite and more numerous, helping Russia launch more attacks and gradually gain the advantage.
The most intense is in the city of Bakhmut, where the commander of the Ukrainian unit Denys Yarolavskyi said Russian regular forces had been deployed this week. In the Russian reinforcement force, there are skilled paratrooper units, which helped Russia make progress in many areas around Bakhmut on January 29-30.
In just 24 hours, Russian forces staged 42 battles within 15 kilometers of Bakhmut, the spokesman for the eastern Ukrainian military district, Serhiy Cherevaty, said on January 31. They are besieging the city of Ugledar, taking control of the village of Mykilske on the outskirts and breaking through the Ukrainian lines near the village of Ternova.
Further north, the Russian military intensified its long-range shelling from within its territory across the Ukrainian border. The Ukrainian border service said that 120 mm cannon fired from Russian territory repeatedly hit the Sumy and Chernihiv regions on January 26.
Russia also continued its lightning strikes, launching 55 air and sea cruise missiles and 24 drones into Ukraine on January 26. Ukraine’s air defense system claims to have shot down 47 missiles and all 24 Russian drones.
The next day, Russia used an S-300 missile to hit a ground target in the town of Kostyantynivka in the Donetsk region, killing three people and injuring 14.
After this attack, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky continued to call on the West to support Kiev with long-range weapons. “Ukraine needs long-range missiles to eliminate the possibility of the enemy placing missile launchers far from the front lines and destroying our cities,” Zelensky said.
The reality of the battlefield and Ukraine’s urgent calls are said to be the driving force for the US and its Western allies to change their views and race to provide more powerful weapons with longer ranges for the country. Ukraine in response to the new Russian offensive campaign.
Pentagon spokesman Patrick Ryder announced on February 3 that the new US military aid package of $ 2 billion for Ukraine includes a long-range rocket called the Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb (GLSDB) with a range of 2 billion USD. up to 150 km, almost twice that of the M142 High Mobility Rocket System (HIMARS).
This is the first time the US has provided such a long-range weapon to Ukraine. “This gives them the ability to strike at a longer range,” Mr. Rider said.
The GLSDB is a combination of the M26 rocket and the GBU-39 small-diameter bomb, which can be launched from ground platforms such as the M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MRLS) and HIMARS.
With a range of 150 km, the GLSDB is able to hit Russian positions far behind the front lines in the Donbass region, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson provinces, and northern Crimea. This type of rocket can make the power of the HIMARS cannon even more effective.
This is very important because Russia has learned from previous mistakes and positioned ammunition depots about 80-120 km from the front lines in the Rostov region, beyond the range of HIMARS, according to the deputy director of Ukraine’s military intelligence. Vadym Skibitskyi.
“The most important thing for Russia right now is the ammunition depots and they must be destroyed,” Skibitskyi said. Without these ammunition depots, Russia’s artillery fire advantage on the battlefield was almost nullified.
The long-range weapons also allow Ukraine to weaken Russia’s defenses before starting a new counter-offensive, according to Skibitskyi.
In addition to the US GLSDB rocket, Western countries are also racing to provide more modern, longer-range weapons to Ukraine. Ukraine’s air force spokesman Yuriy Ignat said Kiev will receive Aster 30 surface-to-air missiles manufactured by France and Italy. With a range of 150 km, they can be a perfect match for the GLSDB rocket.
Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki said on January 27 that Poland will provide Ukraine with 60 modern tanks, including the German-made Leopard 2. The United States has also pledged to provide Ukraine with 31 Abrams tanks, bringing the total number of battle tanks that the West has given Ukraine to 119. Ukraine says it needs at least 300 tanks to regain all territories. Russia is in control.
Ukraine’s president said on February 3 that Russia’s spring offensive operation may have begun and its scale will be more clearly shown in the next few weeks. This announcement by Mr. Zelensky is seen as a reminder to the West of the urgency of the transfer of weapons.
German Leopard 2 and British Challenger 2 tanks are expected to be delivered to Ukraine by the end of March, while Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh said the Abrams tanks “need several months” to deliver.
John Psaropoulos, analyst of Al Jazeerasaid the delay left Ukraine’s military without the necessary strength to deal with the new Russian offensive, sparking harsh criticism of the West’s indecisiveness.
Jack Watling, a war expert at the Royal Research Institute for Defense and Security (RUSI) in London, said Germany’s insistence on asking the US to commit to shipping Abrams tanks before agreeing to send the Leopard 2 was wasted. valuable time and complicate Ukraine’s defenses.
“Instead of being delivered one type of tank in bulk, Ukraine received three different types of NATO, all in limited numbers and each with unique, complex maintenance requirements. will delay the time to bring tanks to the front lines and make it difficult for Ukraine itself,” Watling wrote.
According to Watling, the offensive operation in Russia’s Donbass region is a calculation to draw Ukraine into a fierce war of attrition, weakening Kiev’s ability to launch a counterattack in the spring.
The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), based in the US, said that Ukraine’s counter-attack capability is highly dependent on the flow of Western weapons. Since the end of last year, Ukraine has been urging NATO members to transfer tanks and long-range rockets, but all have refused, citing fears of an escalation of the conflict.
However, their reluctance did not prevent the fighting from continuing with increasing intensity, as Russia gradually regained the initiative, shifting from defending against Ukraine’s counter-offensive to a large-scale offensive. .
As Russia successively captured cities and towns near Bakhmut, the West seemed to realize the urgency of the situation and put all its efforts into correcting its mistakes. The U.S. Transportation Command said 60 Bradley armored vehicles pledged last month had been delivered to Ukraine.
Ukraine’s General Staff said that France and Australia have cooperated to produce 155 mm artillery shells for this country’s artillery. German defense group Rheinmetall is also preparing to increase production of tanks and artillery to meet Ukraine’s needs.
The US decided to increase the production of artillery shells six times, a level not seen since the Korean War, to move to Ukraine and build stockpiles for future conflicts. According to New York Timesthe US military purchased 14,400 shells per month before tripling in September 2022 and doubling it to 90,000 in January.
Analysts say that these moves by the West can help Ukraine stop the advance of Russian forces in the spring, but it will be difficult for them to launch a quick counterattack like at the end of last year.
“If the West started shipping tanks, armor, and long-range rockets to Ukraine from the beginning of summer 2022, Russia would never have the opportunity to regain the initiative as they are doing,” ISW experts said. .
Thanh Tam (Theo Al Jazeera, WSJ)